DOWNLOAD FILE via Mediafire HERE
DOWNLOAD FILE via Googledrive HERE
now republican presidential candidate donaldtrump is facing historically unprecedented attacks from the mainstream media to somedegree of course from the left although they are in fighting between hilary and saundersat the moment. the political establishment is attacking donald trump relentlessly mostnotably the republican political establishment and the donor class or the people who donateto political candidates in return for getting control of vast sessions of the us economywhich they can use it as their own personal training poodle for political and corporateprofits. they are all uniting to attack donald trump which for those frustrated with theexisting system is what gives him some potentially significant appeal.
now we did a previous, the untruth about donaldtrump presentation which we'll link to below. so the lies and slanders, misrepresentationand so on of trump and his history and his political position is pretty well documented.now at the moment, tens of millions dollars in negative political ads are being takenout against trump. that's not over the course of the election nomination process so far.that's every single week, tens of millions of dollars of attack gets being taken outwhich you know kind of begs the question why is there such a strong resistance to trump. now for the average republican, it's kindof frustrating to finally see the republican establishment unite against the common enemy.they were kind of hoping it might be things
like common core, obama care, illegal immigration,high taxes, excessive welfare spending and so on, bad wars, but no. the republican establishmenthas finally drawn a spine and is willing to let slip the dogs for tragically it is againstthe man mo t popular among republicans which i don't imagine is going to end particularlywell. so it's not around policy. it's got to be about something else. the basic argument which i think most peopleunderstand is that trump is not taking the money of the donor class and therefore hecannot be controlled. since he cannot be controlled, he must be destroyed and that is the basicequation that i think is going on. so in our continued valued effort and i would arguelargely successful effort to push back against
the lies of the mainstream media, i give youeven more untruths about donald trump. so the council on american islamic relations.this is interesting. this is the america's largest muslim civil rights and advocacy organizationand there was six date super tuesday poll that was released march 1st 2016, almost 2,000muslim surveyed. and the survey indicates that 67% of muslim voters support the democraticparty and 18% support the republican party. of the 18% who support the republican party,11% support donald trump which is more than all of the other republican candidates combined.so the idea that muslims are shot and uphold and donald trump needs to radically changecourse in order to gain the muslim vote relative to the other republican nominees is incorrect.the muslims are quite significantly in favor
of donald trump. now of course, much more in favor of berniesanders and hillary clinton and this is part of the debate that is occurring about immigrationin that the republicans, the republican donor class likes lots of immigration because itgives them cheap labor. and the democrat donor class and the democrats like cheap immigrationor -- sorry, low rent or third world immigration because it gives them supporters who can reliablybe counted on to vote a democrat. so when republicans say that they're against thirdworld immigration to imply that it merely comes out of racism is foolish and wrong.they simply don't want the deck stacked with people who were going to vote against theirpolitical self interest. so it can't be that
hard to figure out what a lot seem to havetrouble with it. comparing candidate support among muslims,the john mccain in 2008 had a 2% support among muslims, mitt romney in 2012 and a 4% supportdonald trump in 2016 has an 11% support amongst muslims. so that is quite important. so imean muslims to some degree left islamic countries because they didn't want to live in islamiccountries. and so they moved to america to live in america. the fact that donald trumpwants to limit muslim immigration at least for a time period is not way out of line withwhat a lot of muslims wants which is not to live under sharia law and beheadings and allthat kind of stuff. that's important facts which again you are not going to see reportedin the mainstream media who liked to portray
donald trump as islamophobe and a sinophobeand all that kind of stuff. well if he is in islamaphobe, i guess thereare a lot of people in islam or a lot of muslims who support him as well which would mean theyare islamaphobes against them -- who knows. who could even go down that rabbit hole? tooconfusing. the sikh americans for trump organizer, jasdip singh said, "trump is not at all againstthe sikh so the muslim community. what he says is give and spin the mainstream mediagives a spin because they are scared of him. he is not the status quo. he is not takinganybody's money. when he talks about muslims, he does not talk about all muslims or americanmuslims. he speaks in the context of the refugee crisis that was happening in syria. we thesikhs agree with him. muslim americans agree
with him that we should not bring people intothis country before we can vet them." and this was a temporary measure proposed by him. muslim americans for trump organizer sajidtarar said: "we believe he has the ability and capacity to change america. he has builta huge empire. he is self-funding the campaign. there is no special interest behind him. thereis a war going on against trump. every message and speech of his has been twisted." now let'slook at hispanic voters. well in 2000, george bush got 35% of the hispanic vote, 2004 4%,2008 john mccain got 31%, 2012 mitt romney got 27% and as of 2016, donald trump is currentlyreceiving 17%. now, again there are a lot of hispanics who are uncommitted. so thisis the hispanics who are willing to go on
record or at least in a poll talking abouttheir support for donald trump. clearly these numbers are low. i mean they are half, whatgeorge bush got in 2000 but there may be some particular demographic reasons for all ofthat. so this line here is mexican born immigrantsinto the united states from 1850 to 2010. here you can see since the 1970's, it's gonecompletely mental. this is the total mexican born immigrants in the united states. so thisis of course for those who don't know there was an act passed by ted kennedy in 1965 whichbasically shifted immigration from europe to the third world and i have gotten to thereasons for that beforehand but basically the democrats were unable to win in a debatewith the americans after the horrifying nature
of socialism and communism as revealed bynikita khrushchev in the '60s talking about the culture personality and the evils thatjoseph stalin had committed as a party leader. over the previous few decades and so theysaid, "okay. well we can't win the debate so we're just going to start stacking thedeck by bringing in third world immigrants who are more sympathetic toward socialismwho haven't grown up with the sort of freedom club european commitment to relatively smallgovernment and this is -- he has gone completely mental and this is not watch the average americanin the 1960's and 1970's wanted. it certainly was not -- nobody was asked. in fact the promisewas made that it would not change the demographics of the united states in 1965 immigration billand this is proven to be completely false
and of course whites are on track to be aminority within america within a couple of decades, and they obviously are pushing backagainst that. why? because why people tend to vote republican and hispanics tend to votea democrat as to muslims says to a lot of other people from third world countries. and so if you want to have a small limitedgovernment ideal, then you're going to push back against third world immigration not becauseof racism but because you can read the numbers and they do tend to vote third world immigrantsto tend to vote on mass for democrat which is why democrats want them in the country.it's not that complicated. the argument could easily be made that the sort of illegal immigrationaspect is vastly underreported. there are
some pretty credible estimates that upwardsof 30 million in america which is massive. mexico central bank reported remittent thistotaling 21.27 billion dollars in 2010 and 24.8 billion dollars in 2015 that's 16.6%increase in only five years, remittances of the money being sent back to mexico by hispanicsliving or mexicans living in america. the mexico said it was the first time remittanceshave totaled more than oil revenues at 23.4 billion dollars since it began tracking them.so i mean i mean we can at least understand that for a lot of americans, paying welfareto mexicans who then send the money to mexico is not really the very best use of hard earnedtax money being taken especially if an infrastructure is collapsing and schools are doing terriblyand so on.
so this is welfare usage. negative householdsconsume welfare at 30%, immigrant households at 51%. immigrants consume a lot more welfarethan the domestic population. among asians, 22% of natives consume welfare 33% of immigrantsamong whites is 23% and 35%, hispanics 54% of native households consume welfare and 70%of immigrant households consume welfare. among blacks, it's 55% of natives and 53% of blackimmigrants consume welfare. so when i guess asians and whites see hispanics and blackscoming into the country, they see their taxes going up and particularly with hispanics aswell, there are of course mexican -- sorry, spanish versus english language challengeswhich need -- would be addressed in the school system thus taking away further resourcesfrom asian or white or black or any native
kids who speak english, the resources haveto be applied for multilingual situations. so it's a net loss to the asians and the whitesin general to have hispanic and black immigrants and so they don't -- well there is a lot ofthem who say well what's in it for me? i don t see the benefit. immigrant welfare usage by orange and countryand again natives consuming welfare at 30%, central america and mexican immigrants consumewelfare at 73% that's astounding. that's absolutely astonishing. caribbean immigrants 51%, africanimmigrants 48%, south american immigrants 41%, east asian immigrant is 32%, europe 26%,south asia 17%. as you can see 1965, the people who didn't take welfare were no longer allowedto immigrate into america and people who consume
massive amounts of welfare were encouragedto immigrate into america and a lot of the domestic population of all races and ethnicitysaid i don't see how that is really much of a benefit to us at all. so given this massive growth in welfare dependenthispanics, is it any wonder that hispanics tend to vote for the democrats who promiseto generally only increase the gravy train that they're currently relying on. presidentialelection voting on black voters, so in 2000 george bush got 3% of the black vote, 2004got 7%, 2008 john mccain got 1% of the black vote, 2012 mitt romney got 5% of the blackvote and currently in 2016, donald trump's poll is 12% of the black vote. and again dependentson welfare lead people to vote democrat. it's
a clear conflict of interest because if you'redependent upon government programs, can you be objective as to their general value andutility to society as a whole, of course not but that's of course just one of the challengesof the voting system that we have. now this may actually underestimate the degreeof support for trump in the black community. there are various other polls that show himreceiving 25% of the black vote and one poll which had a very small sample, it gave trump40% of the black vote and of course the reason for that among other reasons. one significantreason is that by restricting illegal immigration, donald trump is reducing the number of peoplecompeting for lower wage jobs that blacks are also trying to get. so this is going todo a lot to help the black community and president
obama where almost all metrics regarding theblack community got worse and president obama of the last seven or so years and so yeah,it could be that there are a number of blacks looking for a different option. polling criticism, so oh, you see republicansdon't support trump. recent cnn republic and presidential primary poll has donald trumpat 49%, ted cruz at 15%, marco rubio at 16% and john kasich at 6% nationally. now of course,ted cruz and marco rubio relying on the math skills so generously granted to the americanpopulation by the fine government educational system have said but look, the majority ofthe elect -- 51% do not support donald trump. so we are popular. and of course, yeah that'stechnically true but using the same logic,
85% of the electric don't support ted cruz.84% don't support marco rubio. 94% don't support john kasich. so i don't know. it just seemslike you draw sort and cut off your own arm but i guess they are relying on mathematicilliteracy much like people who keep running up the national day. another criticism, trump cannot beat hillaryclinton. this is in reference to some polling but shows ted cruz, marco rubio and john kasichoccasionally polling better against clinton in a head to head general election match upbecause the problem with these polls is that they completely ignore the electoral collegesystem which greatly overlooks one of donald trump's major general elections strengths,as polling has shown that usually blue states
like michigan and new york are winnable bytrump. in 2000 george w. bush lost the popular vote but won the office of president due tothe electoral college systems. of course, it's not a majority voters who end up choosingthe president. so even if a majority of voters would choose clinton over trump, that is noreference to the actual win ability in the election because of the electoral collegesystem. now, this is also prior to donald trump goingafter hillary clinton. in late 2015, hillary clinton began discussing the war on womenuses card in relation to donald trump. donald trump said mean things about rosie o'donnell.december23rd, 2015 the republican candidate responded via twitter: "the hillary clintonstage event yesterday was pathetic. be careful
hillary as you play the war on women or womenbeing degraded card." what is that in reference to -- well of course to my younger listeners,trump was eluding to bill clinton, hillary clinton's husband and of course x-presidentbill clinton's past related to charges and sexual impropriety and accusations of rape,that is a line which no mainstream republican candidate has dared to cross until now. aftertrump's tweet and the discussions that ensued in the media, clinton's democratic numberswent from 55.3% to 49% within a week. the elder george bush, george h.w. bush knewa lot about clinton's sorted sexual history when he was still running against him butdecided not to use it in the election thus losing. mitt romney in 2012, because mittromney recently came out let's just say somewhat
significantly against donald trump. in 2012,mitt romney said, there are some things that you just can imagine happening in your life.this is one of them. being in donald trump's magnificent hotel and having his endorsementis a delight. i'm so honored and pleased to have his endorsement. donald trump has shownan extraordinary ability to understand how our economy works to create jobs for the americanpeople. i spent my life in the private sector not quite as successful as this guy but successfulnonetheless. yeah, that's kind of faint sucking sound you're hearing from mitt romney in 2012. mitt romney in 2016: "isn't trump a huge businesssuccess and doesn't he know what he's talking about? no, he isn't. no, he doesn't. he inheritedhis business. he didn't create it. whatever
happened to trump airlines, how about trumpuniversity and then this trump magazine and trump steaks and trump mortgage, a businessgenius. he is not." there may be people who can criticize donald trump for somewhat ofa boost from his family fortunes early in life. mitt romney is not one of them. mittromney's father was an american businessman, a republican party politician. he was chairmanand president of american motor's corporation. he was the 43rd governor of michigan and hewas the us secretary of housing and urban development up until the '70s. so the idea that mitt romney who got his moviestar good looks, a huge amount of political expertise and money and education and wealthand fame from his father then calling donald
trump somehow. donald trump's success is theresult of nepotism and so on. i don't know that's a little bit rich literally and figuratively.donald trump said, "he, romney begged me four years ago for my endorsement, i mean literallybegged me and he's a failed candidate. i mean frankly i backed him, he failed. he was ahorrible candidate." continuing the commentary about romney begging for his endorsement trumpnoted i could have said, "mitt, drop to your knees." he would have dropped to his knees.someone in the media then reported that trump claimed romney would have offered him oralsex for his endorsement. oh my, god. things they say in the media. romney also called for trump to release hisfull tax returns: "the reason that i think
there is a bombshell in there is because everytime he is asked about his taxes, he dodges and delays and says, 'well, we're workingon it.' frankly, the voters have it right to see those tax returns before they decidewho our nominee ought to be. there is nothing in the constitution that says you have torelease your tax returns if you want to run for office." now, just as a footnote, 31%of republican voters surveyed said they are now more likely to vote for trump after romney'sattack while only 20% said they are less likely to vote for trump. 43% said that romney'scomments had no impact. this idea that the attack is going to do anythingother than dig people into supporting trump just shows you how to touch the republicanleadership is with the people they claim to
represent i guess is how you could put it.ah, the tax returns, national review. what if trump doesn't have billions? political,five ways trump's taxes could embarrass him. mike akhigbe who does sometimes speak somecommon says why do we have the right to see somebody's tax returns if they have givenus what the government requires? i remember when harry reed on the floor of the senatesaid the word is out. mitt romney hasn't paid any taxes and he just made that up out ofthin air. i was really disappointed when mitt took that approach because i thought mittyou were the victim of that kind of speculation. you shouldn't do it to donald trump. the mediais going to beat him up if he doesn't release it.
newsflash, if he does release it, the mediais going to beat him up over what he releases. it really doesn't matter. trump defended romneyagainst harry reed's tax criticism in 2012 and despite the failed presidential candidates,hypocrisy trump agreed to release his tax returns but noted that is undergoing in orderand it won't do so until the order is completed. donald trump, i get unfairly audited by theirs almost every single year. i have rich friends who never get audited. i wonder why.tax experts rather media agree that no sane person would give their tax returns duringan audit. after the audit, no problem. you're in the midst of negotiating and talking tothe irs. your lawyers would never allow you to do that.
ted cruz said, "maybe it's the case that donald,there have been multiple media reports about donald's business dealings with the mob, withthe mafia. maybe his taxes show those business dealings are a lot more extensive than hasbeen reported. we don't know what it is that he is hiding in those tax returns." yeah,ted, can you literally prove that you're not the zodiac killer? i bet you can. ooh, i wonder.if you're uncertain and in doubt that three apocalyptic demons that a company, the verbiageand co2 emissions of every office on a planet, marco rubio says, "donald trump is clearlyhiding something. we need to see those returns to see if the difference between the auditedversion and what he filed, if there is evidence of wrongdoing."
a former republican -- sorry. the former departmentof justice tax divisions in the council, robert kovacev said, "he's getting good advice. ifhe puts his returns out there, his critics are going to go through, taker something outof context and they'll make a big deal out of that. they'll put pressure on the irs togo and do a big investigation on something that's probably innocuous but because it'san issue, they're going to have to go after it. i would never advice him to release themwhile there is an audit. tax attorney, steven goldburd think of an audit as an investigation,an ongoing investigation. he said, any person that has legal counsel their legal counselwill say if you are under investigation, you should not be talking to the media. you shouldnot be talking to anyone other than your legal
counsel or through your legal counsel. ben carson said, "you know, i never had anaudit until i spoke of the national prayer breakfast and then all of a sudden, they comein. they said we just want to look at your real estate dealings and they didn't findanything. so they said let's look at the whole year and they didn't find anything. so theysaid let's look at the next year and the next year. the irs as an arm of political vengeanceis not exactly unknown in recent american politics. cruz and rubio aimed to put morepressure on trump by releasing their tax returns but only disclosed the first two pages oftheir returns just to form 10, 40 without any other forms or schedules.
tax attorney, robert barnes said the disclosureby both cruz and rubio is a joke. the key is a schedule c and their itemized deductionsboth of which are missing from their disclosure is still hidden from the public even thoughthey were in public office during this time period. all of the information that wouldreveal the truth of cruz and rubio's financial activities remain hidden. if rubio and cruzheld themselves to the same standard that they demand of trump, they would have disclosedit all, not hidden the most important tax documents for political disclosure purposes.there must be something bad in there because given how much they criticized trump, theywould have disclosed more. tax attorney martin shenkman says the grossnumbers without the schedules don't tell you
anything. rubio's attacking trump on the samedisclosure issues but his own disclosures are obfuscatory. ted cruz is currently beinginvestigated by the federal election, commission for failure to disclose two separate loans,one from his wife's employer goldman sachs the other from citibank during his senatecampaign. during the senate campaign, he railed in a tea party way against the influence offinancial institutions on the electoral process while failing to disclose two loans from bigfinancial institutions could that have changed the outcome of the election? i guess we'llnever know now. now renaissance technologies had hedge fundmanager robert mercer has contributed at least 11 million dollars in support of cruz' presidentialcampaign and robert's mercer's company is
being investigated by the irs for underestimatingits tax bill by at least six billion dollars over 14 years. of course cruz wants to abolishthe irs. could that be somewhat beneficial if achieved by men currently being investigatedby the irs, i guess we can say it's possible. rubio has paid for personal expense with republicanparty credit cards had his campaign fined by the fec for an estimated $210,-000 in improperdonations and review made a $200,000 profit from selling a house to the mother of a lobbyistand then changed his mind about the lobbyist's states insurance regulation rule changes,quite a coincidence. rubio'-s finances had been significantly subsidizedby florida billionaire norman braman who paid rubio's wife at least $54,000 to assist inthe distribution of $250 in charitable contributions.
braman essentially funded a $69,000 a yearteaching job for rubio at florida international university and donated at least six milliondollars in support of his presidential campaign. according to the new york times directed over85 million dollars in taxpayer funds to braman's favored courses. so a relatively robust returnon investment i guess you could say. ah, the new york times status came up in thelast presidential debate on the republican side. now the story originated in buzz feed,the buzz feed produces the kind of pullet, a style award winning journalism like 17 picturesof donald trump's not at all below average sized hands and help us pick the best donaldtrump penis pun and where in canada should you move if trump becomes president.
quality institution, on january 5th, 2016,trump spoke with the new york times editorial board and in off the record capacity relatedto a possible endorsement. such meetings are often done with presidential candidates duringthe election cycle and are not for the purpose of writing new stories. it was trump's preferencefor a part of the discussion to be on the record, so he could officially answer a question-relatedtotaris which is uncharacteristic for these types of beadings in open trump up to furtherattack. donald trump, we had a board meeting. it wasoff the record, all of a sudden they leak it. it's all over the place. now, the contentof what was said in this off the record meeting has not been revealed merely that there wasone and apparently somebody recorded it. off
the record is very, very important for a journalist.so it allows you to get information that is not going to make it into the story but iscan be essential to have -- i wonder how the new york times is going to fail in the futurewhen offering the people off the record interviews. hmm, i wonder if they care. so ted cruz said, apparently there is a secrettape with the new york times editorial board has of donald trump saying that he doesn'tbelieve what he's saying on immigration. i call on donald, ask the new york times torelease the tape. if donald didn't say that to the new york times, then he deserves tohave that cleared up and releasing the tape can clear it up the alternative is that itis true. he is such a troll. pixar didn't
have -- marco rubio said, it sounds like whathe told the new york times is different from what he is telling you. donald trump shouldask the new york times to release the audio of his interview with them so we can see exactlywhat it is he truly believes about this issue which he has made the cornerstone of his campaign. the new york times editor andrew rosenthalsaid, these sessions are not about news gathering for stories. it's not as if we are sittingon a new story here or holding something back from publication. so this meeting occurred,apparently someone taped it and now people are just randomly speculating about what thecontent might be of what was recorded. now trump university in 2004, trump universitybegan a series of business and real estate
focused seminars. some were online and aswell as mentorship programs. the name of the business eventually led to trouble as newyork attorney general eric schneiderman accused trump of running an unlicensed school andin response the name was changed to the trump entrepreneur initiative in 2010. so because he called it a university or itwas called a university but it didn't go to grant degrees and didn't go through an accreditationprocess that names had to be changed. now according to the washington post, more than80,000 people attended the free introductory seminars that were held in hotel ball roomsand so on around the united states. about 9,200 of these peoples signed up for a three-dayonline seminars for just under $1500 and about
800 paid for the $35,000 package that includedone-on-one mentoring. so a lot of people got free introductory education, small percentageof them went on to a more advanced stuff and various lawsuits originated with several peopleand grew to 150 in total as it reached class action status or about 2% of students whojumped -- but 2% of the students who took the courses jumped on the class action gravytrain i guess you could say. now depending on the seminar and location,some granted refunds to 25 to 40% of those in attendance and that's a very generous refundpolicy to put it mildly. so there are currently three active lawsuits related to trump university,one by the new york attorney general's office and two related california class actions.the new york investigation originated due
to the university name as it was posted bya dozen complaints. marketwatch has said, "tarla makaeff, thelead plaintiff in the case spent nearly $60,000 to pay for trump university products overthe course of one year. the lawsuit claims what she got in return were two offices forreal estate deals that were 'floored' and 'appeared unprofitable.' the cases appearto be or potentially could be described as a remedy for bias remorse for investment inreal estate education that people spent a lot of money on right before the collapseof the united states housing market and the business of course had a pretty generous policyand even often refunds which were ignored to several of the people who would later filea suit against the company."
candidate marco rubio released a negativeadvertisement focusing on trump university using on camera statement from several formerstudents including bob guillo and kevin scott. now in a survey which he feel that after takingthe trump u-course, bob guillo rated the courses five out of five in every category notingthat he'd attend another trump university seminar and would even recommend the seminarsto a friend. kevin scott also gave the course five out of five ratings for every optionincluding writing in five plus, plus and noted that his overall experience was outstanding,very informative. i feel very comfortable. when asked if he'd like to share his successstory with trump university in the future, scott answered, "yes!!"
donald trump said, "they just want to gettheir money back. so normally somebody would immediately settle. i just can't do that.i don't like to settle. when i'm right about something, i like to go to court. so i'llgo to court. we have 98% of the people who took the courses, have reports like this.when they are on the stand, they will be shown these reports. you have people doing the commercial.they say terrible things and they sign reports saying it was excellent in all respects. whywould anyone settle a case when we have reports like this?" now the new york times said that the betterbusiness bureau gave the school a d minus for 2010, its second lowest grade after receiving23 complaints. the better business bureau
statement is this. "during the period whentrump university appeared to be active in the marketplace, bbb received multiple customercomplaints about this business. these complaints affected the trump university bbb rating whichwas as low as d minus in 2010. as the company appeared to be winding down, after 2013 nonew complaints were reported. complaints over three years old automatically rolled off ofthe business review according bbb policy. as a result over time, trump university'sbbb rating went to an a in july 2014 and then to an a plus in january 2015." so that's important. the fact that trump is waving around thathe's got a great rating may have something to do with the complaints rolling off afterthe three-year period more than an improvement.
now of course the low bbb rating simply meansthe complaints have been filed against the business. it doesn't mean that they aren'tinvestigating to find out if they're true or false. it doesn't mean that the businessis guilty of any wrongdoing or impropriety. as of september 2015, the trump entrepreneurinitiative currently has no rating as "the company is believed to be out of business." now the crooks of the case seem to centeron statements by trump in marketing materials related to his handpicking of instructors.trump later confirmed under oath that he neither selected the instructors nor oversaw the curriculumwith the business ultimately being more of a licensing agreement on his end. now of coursein the end, everybody and it'll probably be
years from now will have their day in courtand this will be resolved one way or another. but saying everybody -- knowing exactly whatit was about or it was fraud or whatever, we'll find out over time. trump and his discontinued businesses. sotrump shuttle. this was the luxury airline surface which was operated from 1989 to 1992when trump sold the business to shuttle inc and shuttle inc was later purchased by emergewith the us airways in 1997. the business, this is one of the reasons why people don'tlike getting into airlines, the business faced union related issues very early on. therewas a northeast economic recession in 1989 which negatively impacted demand. and thenof course in august 1990, the iraqi invasion
of kuwait caused jet field prices to double.it is reported that the business was never profitable during trump's ownership but it'sclear that external factors played a significant role over 50 airlines of a file for bankruptcysince 1980. trump vodka, they viewed in 2006 before beingdiscontinued in 2011. trump discussed the creation of his vodka brand on larry kinglive and it sounded like a friendly business rivalry as oppose to a major economic investment."a great friend of mine was a founder of great goose and what we going to do is top it. iwant to top them just because it's fun to top my friends." trump magazine, well therewere several attempts to create a trump magazine. the latest attempt was fairly successful reachinga circulation of about 100,000 and selling
for just under six bucks a unit but the magazinewent out of circulation in 2009. the magazine industry has contracted year after year withthe rise of digital media. go trump was a very short-lived trump brandedtravelocity powered search engine, the very low overhead, it was just a rapper for travelocity.it didn't go very far but didn't also cause very much. trump steaks. so in 2007, trumppartnered with a shopper image to release a line of trump branded mail order of steaks.many have incorrectly reported that the actual steaks were available for purchase at shopperimage stores but no, the steaks were packed in dry ice and shipped. you just filled outthe order. so trump steaks just clearly a licensing arrangement to capitalize on andpromote the trump brand in already existing
industry. of course people look at stuff like they sayoh, trump is a terrible businessman. well i'm not so sure about that. the trump steakscampaign brought a lot of business to sharper image. national managers of sharper imagenoted that people would come into the store saying why do you have a picture of trumpin the window? and they'd end up buying either the trump steaks or something else. one manager said, "our sales sharper imagefrom that period went up dramatically and we have made millions of dollars." what havecost them to do this, i don't know. but it was an exercise in branding. i don't knowif that's what he had in mind from the beginning.
so it seemed to work at least for sharperimage and of course again, these are businesses in general that started right before somebig economic downturn right the trump shuttle, right before the gulf war and trump vodkaday viewed in 2006, a year or two before the financial collapse and trump magazine wentout of circulation 2009 and the depth of the financial crash trump steaks 2007 launchedagain right before a huge financial crash where up to 40% of america's wealth got wipedoff the map and the people could no longer afford any kind of luxury goods. so is thatreally -- it's like clothing someone a bad fisherman because there was a media strikeon his boat. i don't know. so donald trump has had hundreds of businessesover a 40 plus year public career. not all
of them are currently active and not all wereprofitable. so the fact that people are just bringing up a few repetitive samples of businesses,they just don't understand business. you try a whole bunch of stuff and some of it worksand some of it doesn't. that's business. you could look at my lowest rated videos or lowestpopularity videos and say he is terrible at what he does. it's like yeah, well we've had150 million views and downloads over the years. so you can just look at the song steal andby queen. anyway, you could take the worst of anything. paul mccartney hasn't released a hit in decades.he's a terrible musician. he's a terrible songwriter. other than trump shuttle, allof these were just low overhead licensing
deals looking to capitalize on the value ofthe trump brand. right before recession, i don't know. ah, trump voted for obama excepthe really didn't. at january 16th, 2016, glenn beck circulated a fake donald trump tweetingclaims the republican candidate and supported barack obama for president in both 2008 and2012. back later apologize for circulating the fake tweet noting that it was his fallfor not checking it far enough and there are websites you can create fake tweets from people.it's pretty easy to see what's going on but didn't even bother checking that. it didn'thave the authentic -- but anyway glenn beck's original post, "myresearchers are split tonight, whether or not this was a hack or a fake. i want to makesure that you know from me first that the
stuff is split down the middle not enoughto say real or fake at this point. there is no denial from the campaign on this tweetbut i do not want to run anything that is not accurate. so he says he doesn't want torun anything that's not accurate but posts it anyway. i didn't do a simple google searchto find the audio and video of trump endorsing both mccain and romney for president. thisis even more absurd because trump's endorsement of mccain was part of the whole war hero controversymonths earlier which we talked about in the last untruth about trump presentation. sobeck was aware, completely aware of trump's involvement in supporting mccain's campaignbut decided to post the fake tweet anyway. now despite the "apology from glenn beck"the noted ted cruz support a continue to claim
that trump supported barack obama for presidentincluding writing a 17 point conspiracy theory article ending with, "do i believe donaldtrump voted for barack obama in 2008? yes, yes i do." now, donald trump on larry kinglive discussing john mccain in 2008, "i've known him. i like him. i respect him. he'sa smart guy and i think he's going to be a great president. i endorse him. donald trump,the guy goes on television and says, "i voted for barack obama." i was on john mccain'scommittee, raised a tremendous amount of money for john mccain, had dinner with john mccainright before the election and i've got to listen to this idiot glenn beck say, "i wasfor obama." donald trump and also mitt romney in 2012:"it's my honor, real honor and privileged
to endorse mitt romney. mitt is tough. heis smart. governor romney go out and get him." supreme court justice appointment, so afterthe death of supreme court justice antonin scalia, trump suggested diane sykes and billpryor as examples of people -- he'd look to a point to the supreme court as president.trump announced these names during the republican debate on february 13th, 2016. ted cruz onfebruary 14th, 2016. you know, the one person he has suggested that would make a good justiceis his sister who is a court of appeals judge appointed by bill clinton. she is a hardcorepro abortion liberal judge and he said she would make a terrific justice. now, while trump's older sister, maryannetrump barry was appointed to her current post
by bill clinton. in 1999, she was nominatedfor advancement by president ronald reagan in 1983. boy, it was quite a gene pool. judgetrump barry did join in ruling a new jersey on partial birth abortions unconstitutional.unfortunately for cruz, supreme court justice samuel alito also shared that opinion, thesame justice alito that cruz recently claimed, he'd model his nominees after. so when trump'ssister does it, it's really bad when cruz's guy joins her in doing that cricket silencedistraction squirrel. donald trump february 14th, 2016. my sister, she also happens tohave a little bit different views in me but my sister obviously would not be the rightperson. it's the conflict of interest for me.
taxes and the federal reserve. so you heardthis on the debates and someone, trump's tax plan will bankrupt america said several recentdebates trump was grilled about this opposed cost of his tax plan. the tax foundation saidwith a straight face, i guarantee it. "donald trump's tax plan would enact a number of taxreforms that would both lower a marginal tax rates on workers and significantly reducethe cost of capital. these changes in the incentives to work and invest would greatlyincrease the us economy's size in the long run leading to higher incomes for tax payersat all income levels. the plan would also be a large tax cut which would increase thefederal government's deficit by over ten trillion dollars both on a static and dynamic basis.
this economic modeling -- if trillions ofdollars end up in the hands of american tax payers, they are going to use it to buildbusinesses, to invest, to grow, do rnd. who knows what amazing products are going to beproduced in the future that are going to make things much more efficient. anybody who saysthey know exactly what tax cuts are going to do for the economy of a ten-year period,i don't even know what to say. this is so ridiculous plus of course, that's assumingthat you can't get government spending at all during that time period i would assume.and so anyway -- that is non-sense. in addition to the absurd of this type of economic modeling,moderators often neglected to direct similar questions to ted cruz and marco rubio whosetax plans are forecasted to cast 3.6 trillion
dollars and 6.8 trillion dollars respectively. in trump's plan, single files will pay a rateof 0% if their income is between zero and $25,000, 10% for $25,000 and $50,000, 20%for $50,000 and $150,000 and 25% for $150,000 and up. now that kind of simplifies tax planwhich sets fire to six million forest worth of irs tax codes. what is that going to dofor the economy when people aren't confused, have to pay billions of dollars to accountantsand spend billions of hours trying to win their way through the mandarin bureaucratictax maze of the irs code. what is that going to do for the economy? nobody knows otherthan its good to have less taxes and fewer taxes. federal reserve, in addition to itsfrequent discussion of currency manipulation
internationally in the impact it has on theamerican economy, trump has been very vocal on problems caused by the federal reserve. donald trump, "in terms of real estate, ifi want to develop from standpoint, i like low interest rates. from the country standpoint,i'm just not sure it's a very good thing because i really do believe we're creating a bubble."trump has also noted, "it is so important to audit the federal reserve." ron paul hassaid, "donald trump deserves credit for at least mentioning the federal reserve creatingbubbles through artificially low interest rates." the central park 5, oh, i'm not young.i remember this so well. april 1989, 28 year old investment banker named trisha meili wasjogging through new york central park when
she was bludgeoned with a rock, gagged, tied,raped and left for dead. she was discovered hours later unconscious suffering from hypothermiaand severe brain damage having lost 80% of her blood, a terrifying savage wild attack. now trump reported to pay $85,000 to placean advertisement to the city's four major papers with the headline, "bring back thedeath penalty. bring back the police." the advertisement said, "i want to hate thesemuggers and murderers. they should be forced to suffer. and when they kill, they shouldbe executed for their crimes. they must serve as examples so that others will think longand hard before committing a crime or an act of violence." now, this is when the democratswere in charge of new york city and it was
pretty feral like escape from new york washalf documentary. oh, boy, there's an old movie referenced – snake pliskin! and so this was a time of extreme lawlessnessand very high crime rates before the republicans came in and sort of sheriff up the place andcleaned the house. of course, trump has a lot of properties in new york and if peopledon't want to come and visit because they are terrified of being attacked, that's goingto have some effect on his evaluation to put it mildly. convicted suspect yusef salaamsaid he was the fire starter. common citizens would be manipulated and swayed into believingthat we were guilty. if we were wise, would donald trump have written this in the paper?boy, it's great to see somebody finally playing
the race card when it comes to criminality.oj. antron mccray, kevin richardson, raymond santana, kharey wise and yusef salaam werearrested, tried, convicted by multiethnic juries and issued prison sentences. the teenagers, four african american and onehispanic would become known collectively as a central park 5. now ann coulter, a lawyerwho has written extensively on this issue said, "all those charged with the jogger'srape gave detailed corroborated videotaped confessions. after full warnings, four ofthe five in the presence of an adult relative, all five confessed to assisting the attackon the jogger but none to raping her themselves. that is enough for a rape conviction.
matias reyes, a criminal, repeated rapistand murderer serving a life sentence confessed to the rape while in prison and claimed andhe had acted alone. this confession served as the basis for the re-examination for thecentral park 5 cases. ann coulter, race had absolutely nothing to lose by confessing tothe rape, the statue of limitations had run and much to gain by claiming he acted alone.he got a favorable prison transfer and the admiration of his fellow inmates for smearingthe police. contrary to media reports, there was hair, blood or semen on all five of thedefendants. there are full videotaped confessions. there is dna, blood, semen, hair on the defendantsbut some jailhouse guy with nothing to lose claiming that --
as the case was retried in the politicallycorrect court of public opinion, these self admittedly guilty men were released at thesuggestion of soon to be retiring manhattan district attorney robert morgenthau. the centralpark 5 will later award the settlement of 40 million dollars from new york city forwrongful imprisonment. now trump has been criticized for his original advertisementand additional statements on the case over the years but it's consistent with his willingnessto speak politically incorrect truths and has decided to crack down on criminality. david duke, we're back. donald trump recentlycame under fire for refusing to disavow david duke despite the fact that trump disavowedhim as early as 1991, again in 2000, in august
2015 and many times in 2016 before the controversialinterview. november 19th, 1991, donald trump, "i hate seeing what david duke getting 55%of the white vote for the governor of louisiana represents. but i guess it just shows thereis a lot of hostility in this country. there is a tremendous amount of hostility in theunited states. it's anger. i mean there is anger vote. people are angry about what'shappened. february 14th, 2000, you have got david dukejust joined, a bigot, a racist, a problem. i mean this is not exactly the people youwant in your party. february 19th, 2000. the reform party now includes the klansman, mr.duke, and a neo-nazi, mr. buchanan, and the communist ms. fulani. this is not companyi wish to keep. david duke on august 26, 2015.
i'm not endorsing donald trump. i believethat the discussion on the immigration issue is a legitimate discussion. it's a good thingand i appreciate the fact that these issues are being raised. august 26, 2015 trump said, "i don't needdavid duke's endorsement. i certainly wouldn't want his endorsement. i don't need anybody'sendorsement." when asked if he'd repudiate an endorsement from duke trump replied, "sure,i would do that if it would make you feel better. i don't know anything about him. alot of people like me, republicans like me, liberals like me, everybody likes me." davidduke on february 25th, 2016, voting against donald trump at this point is really treasonto your heritage. i'm not saying i endorse
everything about trump. in fact, i haven'tformally endorsed him but i do support his candidacy and i support voting for him asa strategic action. i'm just in general, it's just part of thedouble standards that black people can overwhelmingly vote for a black candidate and nobody saysthat that's racist. but if somebody who is interested in white heritage says well weshould vote for somebody who is going to keep third worlders out of this country. well heis just a white supremacist, racist, whatever. i don't know much about david duke at allbut the double standard is predictable and boring. february 26, 2016. trump said, "i didn't evenknow he endorsed me. david duke endorsed me,
okay, all right. i disavow, okay?" february28, 2016. well just so you understand, i don't know anything about david duke, okay? i don'tknow anything about what you're even talking about with white supremacy or white -- soi don't know. i don't know any -- honestly, i don't know david duke, i don't believe ihave ever met him. i'm pretty sure i didn't meet him and i just don't know anything abouthim. february 29th, 2016. i'm sitting in a housein florida with a very bad earpiece that they gave me and you could hardly hear what hewas saying. but what i heard was various groups and i don't mind disavowing anybody and idisavowed david duke and i disavowed him the day before with a major news conference andi heard me very easily disavow david duke.
so naturally the next question is, do youdisavow david duke? just because they want to get trump in kkk, trump and david duke,trump and white nationalism, trump and race. i just want to get those things in the samesentence. it's got nothing to do with any pursuit of truth. also there was some voteof photos circulating about supposedly kkk members holding pro donald trump signs exceptsomebody very quickly pointed out that they had black hands holding these signs not tothe most authentic or believable kkk brother members. march 3rd, 2016. he said, trump said davidduke is a bad person who i disavowed on numerous occasions over the years. i disavowed him.i disavowed the kkk. do you want me to do
it again for the 12th time? i disavowed himin the past. i disavow him now. many in the media continued to portray the fiction thattrump refused to disavow david duke's endorsement which wasn't even given long after trump'sdisavow. i can't imagine why donald trump, things that people in the media are dishonestand manipulative. shocking, it's a mystery we’ll crack in one day. donald trump is scared of megyn kelly thebullet proof make up. trump contemplated not attending the fox news debate on january 29th,2016 noting the moderator megyn kelly isn't fair to him. trump posted a poll on twitterasking supporters should i do the gop debate. fox news responded with an official statement."we learn from a secret black back channel
that the ayatollah and putin both intend totreat donald trump unfairly when they meet with him if he becomes president. a nefarioussource tells us that trump has his own secret plan to replace the cabinet with his twitterfollowers to see if he should even go to those meetings. that's such a shit post. i meanthat's such drollery. it was after fox news released the statementthat trump decided to throw a fundraiser for veterans instead of attending the iowa debate.according to a yougov brandindex survey, the perception of fox news among republicans hita three-year low and has declined by approximately 50% since january of 2016. veterans fundraiser.who is keeping the money, people? on january 28th, 2016, donald trump held a fundraiserfor veterans groups and raised over six million
dollars including his own personal donationof a million dollars though donations were collected by the donald j. trump foundationwhich is a 501c3 nonprofit organization. due to the organization's involvement on speculationsspread that instead of donating the money to the veterans groups, trump would use thedonations to fund his presidential campaign. i mean the man is statistically and technicallya genius based upon his entrance scores to get into the school of -- wharton school ofbusiness i think he went to. so the idea that he would say i'm going to raise money forveterans and then use it on his own presidential campaign. i mean how retarded would you haveto be to remotely think that was a good idea especially when you've got so much money thatyou don't even need to think about anything
like that, i don't know. people are just projecting.it's the dunning-kruger effect -- people just projecting their own stupidity onto smarterpeople. it's really great too that the media is reallyobsessed about whether donald trump's foundation might have misused some funds. great to seethem all over the clinton foundation. oh, wait. that's the fbi at the moment so hoton that trail. the media investigated, could only confound that $800,000 had been distributedas many of the veterans groups refused to comment shortly thereafter the trump campaignreleased a list of 27 veterans organizations which received 2.9 million dollars as of march2016 if it's also been noted that fund disposal can take time due to vetting procedures andtiming requests from the charities involved.
they may want to go onto the next fiscal year,whatever. trump campaign spokeswoman hope hicks: "ifthe media spent half as much time highlighting the work of these groups and how a veteranhave been so mistreated rather than trying to disparage mr. trump's generosity for atotally unsolicited gesture for which he had no obligation." we would all be better forit to which the media naturally replied, "has trump disavowed the kkk?" throughout the process,trump has been criticized for politicizing veterans charities not immediately releasingthe list of charities he would be supporting not providing immediate proof that the fundshave been disposed and been accused of keeping the funds for his own financial gain.
pope francis, excellent. pope francis, february18th, 2016: "a person who thinks only about building walls wherever they may be and notof building bridges is not a christian. this is not the gospel. as far as what you saidabout whether i would advise to vote or not to vote, i am not getting involved in that.i say only this man is not a christian if he has said things like that." now the popelives in vatican city. vatican city is surrounded by massive stone walls. you know, for peoplewho say walls around boarders are a really bad idea, ask them if they have talked aboutvatican city or israel for that matter and see whether there is any i don't know, anti-americanbias in this criticism of walls. try to go live in vatican city. just go try and becomea citizen of vatican city and see how much
lucky you have. donald trump, the mexican government and itsleadership has made disparity marks remarks about me to the pope. the pope only heardone side of the story. he didn’t see the crime, the drug trafficking and the negativeeconomic impact the current policies have on the united states. for a religious leaderto question a person's faith is disgraceful. no leader especially a religious leader shouldhave the right to question another man's religion or faith. they are using the pope as a pawnand they should be ashamed of themselves for doing so especially when so many lives areinvolved and when illegal immigration is so rampant.
vatican spokesman, father frederico lombardi:"this wasn't in any way a personal attack nor an indication of who to vote for. thepope has clearly said he didn't want to get involved in the electoral campaign in theus and also said that he said what he said on the basis of what he was told about trumphence giving him the benefit of the doubt." okay. that is first of all is not giving someonethe benefit of the doubt and secondly of course, churches in america, the catholic church ofcourse gets to be tax free because it doesn't get involved in politics. the moment it startsinvolving itself in politics, it could lose its tax free status which is probably whyyou see the tea cozy head moonwalk back of the statement by the pope.
the spokesmen, vatican spokesmen went on tosay the pope said what we already know. if we followed his teachings in positions, weshouldn't build walls but bridges. he also said that in relation to migration in europemany times so this is not a specific issue limited to this particular case. it is genericview, coherent with the nature of solidarity from the gospel. i don't know that there ismuch in the new testament about bringing huge numbers of muslims into your christian countriesbut i'm no theologian. george w. bush lied about weapons of massdestruction. donald trump in a debate said, "george w. bush made a mistake. we can makemistakes but that one is a beauty. we should have never been in iraq. we have destabilizedthe middle east. they lied. they said there
were weapons for mass destruction and therewere none and they knew there none. is that true? well in 2005, the commission on theintelligence capabilities of the united states regarding weapons of mass destruction releasethe report outlining how united nations in spectrums have debunked all the evidence sitedby the bush administration that saddam hussein processed nuclear or biological weapons priorto the start of the iraq war that information was very available, well available to allof the people, the architects of that war. new york times on october 2014 said: "from2004 to 2011, american and american trained iraqi troops repeatedly encountered on atleast six occasions were wounded by chemical weapons remaining from years earlier in saddamhussein's rule. in all, american troops secretly
reported finding roughly 5,000 chemical warheads,shells or aviation bombs. now many republicans took this information to mean that bush hadbeen right all along but democrats candidate by claiming that the war was proposed basedon an active weapons of mass destruction program in iraq, not leftovers from the 1980's andthe early 1990's. oh and of course, it was sold that saddam hussein sold to the americanpublic, saddam hussein had weapons capable of dropping these weapons of mass destructionon americans. these don't even remotely qualify. the truth is that disarmament of existingweapons was frequently mentioned by bush by the lead up to the war but these weapons werenot being hidden. they had been abandoned, forgotten and last during the iran iraq warsince tens of thousands of cw ammunitions
were forward deployed along the frequentlyand rapidly shifting battle lines. they are just left to rot in the desert, not part ofan active program. when you add to that, the bush administration claims that hussein hadactive weapons of mass destruction program and the marketing phrase off we don't wantthe smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud. it's indisputable that the war was sold on falsepremises. so here is president george w. bush at theisraeli palestinian summit four months after the us led invasion of iraq in 2003: "i'mdriven with a mission from god. god would tell me george, go and fight those terroristsin afghanistan and i did, and then god would tell me, george, go and end the tyranny iniraq and i did and now again, i feel god's
words coming to me. go get the palestinianstheir state and get israelis their security and get piece in the middle east and by god,i'm going to do it. politics by voices in your head, what could go wrong?" eminent to main, ted cruz ran an advertisementwhich stated that: "trump colluded with atlantic city insiders to bulldoze the home of an elderlywidow for a limiting parking lot at his casino. but the home was in fact never touched andremained standing to this very day." donald trump: "i was going to expand trump taj mahalfor 2000 rooms. i couldn't make a deal with her. in the end, i didn't do it. i would havepaid her five million dollars and she saved me a fortune. i would have spent had i builtthe expansion. it's the house sold for a half-a-million
dollars a few years ago." trump campaign spokesperson, katrina pierson:"the ad is very misleading and in fact an outright lies about a widow's home being bulldozed.when you look at the facts, there is a process in place for eminent domain which was followedin this instance. mrs. coking ended up keeping her property for years because mr. trump didn'tpurchase it and it ended up saving him a fortune. so trump saved money by not buying the houseand the woman lost i guess 400 -- well she lost 4.5 million dollars because he wouldhave spent up to five million dollars to buy it, sold for half-a-million dollars a fewyear ago." donald trump: "so many people have hit mewith commercials and other things about eminent
domain. eminent domain is an absolute necessityfor a country, for our country. the keystone pipeline without eminent domain, it wouldn'tgo ten feet." ted cruz, "donald trump has said he thinks eminent domain is fantasticand he supports using government power to cease private people's homes to give themto giant corporations to say hypothetically build a casino. now, he's entitled to havethat view but my view is we have an obligation to protect the rights of americans and privateproperty is essential to the rights of americans." marco rubio said, "the fundamental right toprivate property has been under assault for years through our government's abuses of eminentdomain while this authority can be a necessary evil in rare cases related to public development.today, it is often wielded by crony capitalist
politicians to benefit wealthy and powerfulprivate developers." bold in nebraska found that jane kleeb: "i think it's fascinatingthat cruz and rubio are trying to use eminent domain to hit donald trump. yet both of themobviously support keystone excel, keystone pipeline and i'm sure any other pipeline thatyou would ask him about, you can't have it both ways. now they of course say well it'sfor public but keystone pipeline is to benefit private businesses. so how is the keystonepipeline different from donald trump? i guess it's because the keystone pipeline isn't successfullyrunning for nomination of the party." ted cruz on eminent domain in 2012: "the constitutionalso provides that property can be taken with due process of law and just compensation andwith respect to securing the boarders. it
is a national security issue. so it has gotno problem with eminent domain. he has got no problem with it for private corporationsto benefit keystone pipeline. just when donald trump fails to use it, suddenly it's really,really terrible. in 2015, marco rubio voted, nay against an amendment intended quote toensure private property cannot be seen through condemnation or eminent domain for the privategain of a foreign owned business entity. ted cruz also voted against this amendment." jeb bush, he doesn't sound like a conservativewhen he embraces eminent domain to use police powers on government to take private propertyfor private use. well so for step, jeb bush is supportive of keystone pipeline which woulddo exactly that. as governor, jeb! bush initiated
the single largest eminent domain privateproperty confiscation in the history of florida in the mid 2000, the florida, the departmentof agriculture began destroying private citrus trees without any offer of compensation dueto an outbreak of citrus canker. the florida state supreme court found the process to bean unconstitutional eminent domain overreach and lawsuits eventually awarded the effectiveproperty owners over $100,000,000 in damages tragically not paid for personally by jebbush. in typical government fashion of course, the illegal property seizure failed to stopthe citrus canker. ah, you have been waiting, haven't you? theporn convention. although donald trump has not had any operational control of the trumptaj mahal casino and hotel in atlantic city
since 2009, he continued to have a 5% steakand a 5% in stock warrants in the business until february 2016. trump has recently beencriticized for the taj mahal which he had no control over hosting the xx exotica expoin both 2013 and 2014. this pornography convention featured women in bondage gear and appearanceby ron jeremy who apparently you say hedgehog with a giant penis, a giant rideable penisand everything else you'd expect at such an event. now in august 2014, trump filed in new jerseyto have his name removed from trump taj mahal saying that the licensing agreement had beenviolated due to the casinos falling "into an outer state of disrepair." too much lubeon the carpet i'm sure. donald trump: "i'd
love nothing more than for the current managersand owners of these hotel casinos to operate them to the highest standards of luxury andsuccess but unfortunately that is not happening. we have no choice but to terminate. in march2015, trump bridged an agreement with new controlling investor carl icahn to allow hisname to remain on the property. donald trump, "i am happy to have reachedthe deal with carl, someone who i have great respect for both personally and professionally.the trump taj mahal under the right leadership and with the proposed significant reinvestmentin the property can be once again a wonderful place for travel and entertainment." plannedparenthood, ted cruz has repeatedly attacked trump claiming that he supports tax payerfunding for planned parenthood which is untrue.
trump has repeatedly denounced tax payer fundingfor planned parenthood and promised to defund the organization as long as they perform abortionsbut he is continuously spoken positively of other women's health services they offer. donald trump, "as long as they do the abortion,i am not for funding planned parenthood but they do cervical cancer work. they do a lotof good things for women but as long as they are involved for the abortions, as you know,they say it's 35 of their work. some people say it's 10%. some people is 8%. i hear alldifferent percentages but it doesn’t matter. as long as they're involved with abortionas far as i'm concerned, forget it. i wouldn't fund them regardless but they do other goodwork." so planned parenthood claims abortions
makes up only 3% of the services they offerwhile critique claim 94% of their services are abortion related. planned parenthood's number counts every serviceinteraction as a separate unit which means a $10 year in pregnancy test counts the sameas a $1500 first trimester abortion. the reality is that planned parenthood's books are notpublic. so the true percentage of funding that goes into abortion is unknown. but iimagine if trump gets to be president that may not continue to remain unknown. on february 28th, 2016, donald retweeted aquote which had been attributed to him but was actually originated by benito mussolini."it is better to live one day as a lion than
100 years as a sheep." now in 2015, gawkersenior writer, ashley feinberg: "created a twitterbot that would post quotes from thewritings and speeches of the italian fascist dictator benito mussolini. but with all ofthem attributed to businessmen and republican presidential candidate donald trump and thisis a silly game of gotcha because evil people can have some pretty cool quotes from timeto time. so what would happen is people would retweet it and they'd say this is really cooland because it's donald trump and then it would be revealed that it was actually frommussolini and be ah, gotcha. this is like what people do instead of having a damn brainor any capacity to reason. now the media gleefully jumped on this asadditional evidence that the real estate developed,
it was an evil nazi in disguise and trumpresponded during a media interview: "it's a very good quote. it's a very interestingquote, and i know it. i saw it. what difference does it make whether it's mussolini or somebodyelse? it's certainly a very interesting quote." chuck todd, "do you want to be associatedwith a fascist?" media is so funny, man. trump says, "no. i want to be associated with interestingquotes." you know that it's better to die on your feet than live on your knees. i don'tknow who said it. it's a pretty interesting quote. i don't know. it's a silly gotcha game.i don't know. i think the media is just terrified. they just start working for a living ratherthan trolling trump supporter violence. so two brothers with long criminal records,scott and steve leader were leaving a red
sox game when they launched a "viscous andunprovoked" attack on a 58 year old hispanic man, breaking his nose and then urinatingon him, asked what motivated the alleged attack scott leader who had been convicted of a hatecrime and jailed for a year for the assault of a moroccan man after the september 11thattacks name dropped donald trump. "donald trump was right. all these illegal need tobe deported." donald trump said, "i haven't heard about that. it would be a shame buti haven't heard about that. i will say that people who are following me are very passionate.they love this country and they want this country to be great again. they are passionate.i will say that and everybody here has reported it."
on march 7th, three hispanic men were involvedin threatening the use of a firearm on a donald trump supporter who confronted them for damaginghis trump for president lawn sign. georgia, nbc news affiliate: "alexander moreno wascharged with aggravated assault, possession of a firearm without a license, possessionof a handgun under the age of 18 and possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony.mauricio rodriguez was charged with making terroristic threats, criminal trespass andpossession of less than an ounce of marijuana. hector ayala was charged with disorderly conducted,all three were charged with violation of georgia's criminal street gang act." have you heardof that? probably not. jeffrey epstein, otherwise known as "ooh!"in 2008, jeffrey epstein was convicted off
and served 13 months of an 18-month sentencein prison for soliciting an underage girl for prostitution. there were significant numbersof people who felt that this was a pretty unholy deal they should have got much more.additional accusations against epstein run far deeper. recently his address book becamea subject of interest and it included donald trump's contact information. okay, other namesin the book include, steven hawking, kevin spacey, barbara walters, alec baldwin, richardbranson, former israeli prime minister ehud barak, elizabeth hurley, john cleese, minidriver dustin huffman, bobby kennedy jr., senator edward kennedy, henry kissinger, mariashriver, rupert murdock and many, many more. the trump organization said, "mr. trump onlyknew mr. epstein as mr. trump owns the hottest
and most luxurious club in palm beach andmr. epstein would go there on occasion." i don't know. trump is a marketing genius. whetheryou like it or not, the fact that he turns this sex crimes, witch hunt into a promotionalopportunity, the most luxurious club. it was pretty cool." gawker has written: "bill clintontook repeated trips on the lolita express, the private passenger jet owned by billionairepedophile jeffrey epstein with an actress in soft core porn movies whose name appearsin epstein's address book under an entry for massages according to flight log books. thelogs also show that clinton shared more than a dozen flights with women who federal prosecutorsbelieve procured underage girls to sexually service epstein and his friends and actedas a potential co-conspirator in his crimes."
you can look this up more. it's pretty repulsivestuff all around with some pretty wide reaching implications to say the least. donald trump apparently called ben carsona child molester. trump has been accused of calling ben carson a child molester. untruth,donald trump said it's in the book that he's got a pathological temper or temperament.that's a big problem because you don't cure that. that's like -- as an example child molester,you don't cure these people. you don't cure a child molester. there is no cure for it.pathological, there is no cure for that. i'm not bringing up anything that's not in hisbook. when he says he went after his mother and wanted to hit her in the head with a hammerthat bothers me. so no, he did not call ben
carson a child molester. mark zuckerberg's personal senator duringthe cnbc republic and debate trump and moderator becky quick had an exchange which led to politifactclaiming trump was pants on fire levels of dishonest. quick said: "you have talked alittle bit about marco rubio. i think you called him mark zuckerberg's personal senatorbecause he was in favor of the h1b visa." trump, "i never said that. i never said that."trump has never used the line himself at least to our knowledge but the immigration policyon his website contains the line, "mark zuckerberg's personal senator marco rubio has a build tripleh1b that would decimate women and minorities." so yeah, he never said it. you may quibblebut at least to our knowledge he's never said
donald trump is owned by wall street in anattempt to push back against trump's claims that other candidates are owned by donorsand lobbyists, media sources have published the liabilities page from his financial disclosurefrom form showing outstanding loans with many major banks. leon h. wolf has said: "if tedcruz is owned by goldman sachs and citibank because they once gave him a million dollarloan even though it is completely or mostly paid back, then donald trump is definitelyowned by not only citibank and goldman sachs but also by every name on this list." whatdoes that mean? so you take out a loan, the terms of the loan are paid back and if youhave taken out the loan before you ran for president, then they can't possibly have usedit as leverage to give you preferential treatments.
so you'll pay them back with preferentiallegislation. it makes no sense. torture. trump recently came under fire forsupporting the use of water boarding and the things that were a "hell of a lot worse."the candidate was asked what he would do if military personnel refused to follow his orders.donald trump: "i have always been a leader. i've had never any problem leading people.if i say do it, they're going to do it. that's what leadership is all about." trump lateradded, "i would use every legal power that i have to stop these terrorist enemies. ido however understand that the united states is bound by laws and treaties and i will notorder our military or other officials to violate those laws and will seek their advice on suchmatters. i will not order a military officer
to disobey the law. it is clear that as president,i will be bound by laws just like all americans and i will meet those responsibilities." republicans are stupid. the following falsequote has been attributed to donald trump in an attempt to smear him. "if i would run,i'd run as a republican. they're the dumbest group of voters of the country. they believeanything on fox news. i could lie and they'd still eat it up. i bet my numbers would beterrific. look, donald trump has had a 40 plus year career in the public there. if theman was so terrible, they'd be so much stuff out there that you could use against themthat you wouldn't need to make stuff up. you wouldn't need to lie. you wouldn't need toexaggerate. you wouldn't need to quote mine.
you wouldn't need to take some inflammatorystatement and refuse to publish where he later would clarify with more details. you justfind all the terrible stuff he'd said and publish it and you wouldn't need to do allthese manipulative tricks. the fact that the guy has been in the publicthere for 40 plus years and there is really not that much that could be used against himis pretty remarkable in many ways. and so i think it's important to just push back.we need to start demanding that the media do a better job. we need to start demandingthat they stop trolling, they start quoting accurately and clear the way for a substantivedebate about the serious and significant policy issues facing america today. and the mediais only going to listen to money. the university
of missouri after some pretty disgracefulbehavior or political correctness recently is seen. it's enrollments dropped by 20% andi would argue his significantly damaged value of getting a degree from the university ofmissouri. so you hit him in the pocket book and so mysuggestion is when you find a media site being dishonest, stop supporting it, stop goingthere, stop taking ads, don't pay anything if you can get to read something on the otherside of a pay. well, if you can't get there, just don't go there. don't give them money.they respond to financial incentives and it is up to the public to keep the media honestand you do that by voting with your dollars because we need the media to get out of theway and let people have an intelligent debate
without stupid stuff like racism, misogyny,war on women, all the general crap that is thrown around all of the exclusively tunedtrollery that is being thrown around. we need to have an intelligent debate and we can'tdo that with the media screaming verbal abuse at everyone who is right of che guevara. that's sort of my suggestion. keep the mediahonest. keep the media honest. they are not going to do it on their own. they're goingto do it because our financial pressure is to stop spending money on dishonest mediaor conversely you can go to freedomainradio.com/donate and help out. this form of media we rely entirelyon your support and donations. we don't take ads from anyone. i wish to really stay focusedon the watchers and listeners and not be beholding
to anybody else other than you. i want tobe responsible and wake up every day, thinking about how i can best serve you and so youcan go to freedomainradio.com/donate to help out this show. thank you so much for watching us. it's alwaysa great pleasure to have these conversations. i look forward to your feedback below. andthe media, don't make me do a third one of these. start telling the truth.
0 comments
Post a Comment